Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPinkston, K.
dc.date.accessioned2016-01-20T16:56:29Z
dc.date.available2016-05-21T09:30:06Z
dc.date.issued2015-05
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationPinkston, K. The Black-White Malleability Gap in Implicit Racial Evaluations: A Nationally Representative Study. Journal of Social Psychology. 2015. DOI: 10.1080/00224545.2014.987200.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0022-4545
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10027/19994
dc.descriptionPost print version of article may differ from published version. This is an electronic version of an article published in Pinkston, K. The Black-White Malleability Gap in Implicit Racial Evaluations: A Nationally Representative Study. Journal of Social Psychology. 2015. DOI: 10.1080/00224545.2014.987200. Journal of Social Psychology is available online at: http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/ DOI: 10.1080/00224545.2014.987200.en_US
dc.description.abstractThis study replicates and extends the experimental design originated by Dasgupta and Greenwald (2001), who found a decrease in implicit pro-White biases after exposure to pictures of admired Black individuals. A nationally representative sample was analyzed comparing implicit pro-White biases among Black and White participants. Hypothesis 1 (H1) predicted a replication of previous research among White participants, and H2, derived from the balanced identity theory, predicted an increased pro-Black bias among Blacks after exposure to admired Black individuals. Results provided partial support for H1 and a lack of support for H2. This is the first study to use a nationally representative sample to examine implicit pro-White biases. System justification theory was used to explain the malleability gap in Black and White pro-racial biases.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThe data for the study above were collected by the Time-sharing Experiments for the Social Sciences with funding from NSF Grant 0818839 acquired by Jeremy Freese and James Druckman, Principal Investigators.en_US
dc.publisherTaylor & Francis (Routledge)en_US
dc.subjectbalanced identity theoryen_US
dc.subjectBlack identityen_US
dc.subjectIATen_US
dc.subjectimplicit attitudesen_US
dc.subjectraceen_US
dc.titleThe Black-White Malleability Gap in Implicit Racial Evaluations: A Nationally Representative Studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record