Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRose, SW
dc.contributor.authorEmery, SL
dc.contributor.authorEnnett, S
dc.contributor.authorReyes, HL
dc.contributor.authorScott, JC
dc.contributor.authorRibisl, KM
dc.date.accessioned2016-05-11T18:06:15Z
dc.date.available2016-05-11T18:06:15Z
dc.date.issued2015-09-11
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationRose, S. W., Emery, S. L., Ennett, S., Reyes, H. L. M., Scott, J. C. and Ribisl, K. M. Retailer opinions about and compliance with family smoking prevention and tobacco control act point of sale provisions: A survey of tobacco. Bmc Public Health. 2015. 15(1). DOI: 10.1186/s12889-015-2231-2.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1471-2458
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10027/20585
dc.descriptionThis is a copy of an article published in BMC Public Health © 2015 BioMed Central Publications. © 2015 Rose et al.en_US
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: The objectives of this study were to document retailer opinions about tobacco control policy at the point of sale (POS) and link these opinions with store level compliance with sales and marketing provisions of the Tobacco Control Act. METHODS: This study conducted interviews of 252 tobacco retailers in three counties in North Carolina and linked their opinions with in-person observational audit data of their stores' compliance with POS policies. We conducted analyses examining retailer factors associated with noncompliance using Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE) controlling for individual, store, neighborhood, and county factors. RESULTS: Over 90 % of retailers support minors' access provisions and a large minority (over 40 %) support graphic warnings and promotion bans. Low levels of support were found for a potential ban on menthol cigarettes (17 %). Store noncompliance with tobacco control policies was associated with both more reported retailer barriers to compliance and less support for POS policies. Awareness of and source of information about tobacco control regulations were not associated with compliance when accounting for neighborhood and county characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: Retailers expressed some support for a wide range of POS policies. Advocates and government agencies tasked with enforcement can work with retailers as stakeholders to enhance support, mitigate barriers, and promote compliance with tobacco control efforts at the point of sale.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipFunding for this study was provided by the Healthy Stores Healthy Communities Product, University Cancer Research Fund to UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center at UNC–CH and the Red Flag Merchant Education Campaign Evaluation, North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services and North Carolina Alcohol Law Enforcement. The funders had no involvement in the study design, collection, analysis, writing, interpretation or decision to publish the results. Funding was also provided by a grant from the National Cancer Institute to Dr Ribisl — “Maximizing state and local policies to restrict tobacco marketing at point of sale”, U01CA154281. Dr. Rose also received funding dissertation funding from the Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center Cancer Control Education Program (R25 CA57726) to support this work.en_US
dc.publisherBioMed Centralen_US
dc.titleRetailer opinions about and compliance with family smoking prevention and tobacco control act point of sale provisions: a survey of tobacco retailers.en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record